The equity dimensions of anti-fossil fuel norms

Summary

In this policy paper, authors from Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) and Mistra Geopolitics explore the complexities of and make recommendations for how anti-fossil fuel norms can promote fairer and more equitable climate action.

Coal fired power plant in the UK. Photo: Steve Allen / Shutterstock.
Coal fired power plant in the UK. Photo: Steve Allen / Shutterstock.

Key messages

  • The past few years have witnessed the emergence of several anti-fossil fuel norms in international climate governance, such as phasing out coal-fired power; phasing out oil and gas; ending public financing for fossil fuels; and fossil fuel subsidy reform.
  • Anti-fossil fuel norms can be (and have been) used by governments and civil society organizations to advance political mobilization against the fossil fuel industry and position themselves as climate leaders.
  • One strength of anti-fossil fuel norms is that they enable unity and international political momentum around simple messages. However, this simplicity can result in national and international equity issues being overlooked, because the norm does not always account for the distributional impacts of shifting away from fossil fuels.
  • Actors that promote anti-fossil fuel norms need to consider the complex ways in which marginalized communities, particularly in the Global South, are locked into fossil fuel production and use. The development of norms that call for the phase-out of fossil fuels should go hand-in-hand with the development of norms that acknowledge the need to meet lower income countries’ development and energy needs and the need for international support to enable low-income countries to achieve this transition.

Conclusion

Actors that promote anti-fossil fuel norms need to consider the complex ways in which marginalized communities, particularly in the Global South, are locked into fossil fuel production and use. The development of norms that call for the phase-out of fossil fuels should go hand-in-hand with the development of norms that acknowledge the need to meet lower-income countries’ development and energy needs and the need for international support to enable low-income countries to achieve this transition.

The researchers discuss and make recommendations based on 14 interviews conducted with experts from civil society, academia and government organizations involved in international climate policy. They focused on four key norms; phase-out of coal-fired power, phase-out of oil and gas, end public financing for fossil fuels and fossil fuel subsidy reform. They found that each norm is well placed to contribute significantly to the rapid phase down of fossil fuels. However, there is a risk that anti-fossil fuel norms do not account for the distributional
impacts of shifting away from fossil fuels, which means they may have unintended and inequitable consequences, unless action is taken to avoid adverse effects.

Citation

Nazareth, A., Shawoo, Z., Verkuijl, C. and van Asselt, H. (2022). The Equity Dimensions of Anti-Fossil Fuel Norms. SEI and Mistra Geopolitics report. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm. http://doi.org/10.51414/sei2022.049

Authors of this publication

Cleo Verkuijl ,